WeLeadUSA:
Message and Purpose

WeLeadUSA: Message and Purpose

This purpose of this website is to extend a proposal to that portion of the American citizenry who are concerned about the direction of their country and world and seek a clear path toward a genuine solution. Though developed over many years and explained in great detail, this proposal is based on simple precepts that exist; both within our democratic-republican framework and national ethos. Further, with no basis in the pursuit of laws, lawsuits, reforms, amendments to the constitution - or other permissions - to solve our most pressing issues, it can be acted upon easily and immediately. On the contrary, the persistent pursuit of such permissions, though they largely make up the remedies that are traditionally and currently understood, offered, and followed - are unnecessary and distracting as such approaches are proven failures that will not work.

WeLeadUSA:
A Clear Choice Requiring a Decision

WeLeadUSA: A Clear Choice Requiring a Decision

It is clearly demonstrated within the pages of this site that the American electoral-political system confers upon its citizenry the potential to exercise unique and extraordinary authority that has gone unrealized. Though these powers and responsibilities were designed to allow the people of the United States far-reaching input and control over their public affairs, their absence from these processes has left a vacuum to be filled by forces motivated by their own ideals. This, at the expense of a high functioning and free United States most American citizens would proclaim as their ideal. It is also clearly demonstrated within these pages that this potential cannot be realized, or those ideals achieved, other than by a visible, coherent body of Americans assembling within an unambiguous plan of purpose and intent; actions that will direct the vast potential of our electoral, technological, and cultural assets towards establishing a new path.

WeLeadUSA:
An Open Source Proposal

WeLeadUSA: An Open Source Proposal

Given that stark reality, it would be ill advised to offer a community - operating in a public-civic environment so beleaguered and lacking in trust - an answer to our most deeply embedded and historic problems by typical and failed means. Such methods would be typical – and likely to fail - because they would present to that public an unknown entity/body, seeking their “support” for the promise of a remedy based on strategies, organization, and hierarchies they took no active part in formulating and approving. Further, they would articulate no vision for the crucial role the people must play; or how any success can be achieved without that. Therefore, the content on this site is best understood as reference material and the suggestions for strategy, planning, and action as an open source proposal available to be taken up by those most capable and motivated to act. Those suggested actions are as clearly laid out as is the reasoning and proof that they will be effective. To start however, the energies of a small number of the capable people will be required; Americans who by their example will show the way.

The Challenge

At a time when Americans have come to greatly distrust the political parties and their electoral system the idea of using the office of precinct committeemen is understandable and useful; but incomplete.

Is it possible that our political parties have been misunderstood?

Are the obstructionist difficulties they present demonstrations of real power, or just a pretense?

The precinct committeemen approach is one of qualitative engagement; exactly what is necessary - however inadequate. Involvement of concerned citizens within the party apparatus is difficult to sustain and duplicate across a vast and diversified republic. This doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done, or that it’s a bad idea; only that it is unlikely to have the desired effects.

This is because we now take only a mass, quantitative, derivative approach to our media and learning systems and THEN keep that separate from our mass, quantitative, derivative electoral system.

All the while, people who are trying to help in this way are left with no cover.

What we need to build on is the call for a path of qualitative intervention and engagement, but with an accessible means to use our system strategically.

Just like with all the problems we face: electoral-media dysfunctions, the threat of economic decline, or assaults on civic freedoms, the activism that claims to represent the American public and stop what is surely not in their interests continue with the same old approaches:

Laws, Lawsuits, reforms, Constitutional amendments
Protest actions
Truth, calls to “wake up”, “share”, and “voice”
More (and more) media content

This has made it difficult for the concerned portion of the public — who are the only ones capable of fixing this to do what is truly required:

Reflect and analyze noted the many failed, fragmented, approaches; if your comments include without their things it was clear that you didn’t that are always doubled down on
Resolve to organize around a focused strategy
But, one based on a precise answer to the actual problem
That will be accessible and powerful across the board

The Good News

The ethos behind the precinct committeemen effort activated concerned citizens who sought answers from our existing constitutional framework.

This is exactly what needs to happen, but it requires a strategic redirect.

In the United States the people have the power to both select and elect a multitude of officials and, by organizing the knowledge and tools to necessary to use those powers, everything can be changed; no protests, laws, reforms or years of wrangling necessary.

This indisputable power renders the political parties with only the authority the people give them by virtue of their lack of deliberate, qualitative participation.

The considered intervention of the activated, civically educated and motivated few, as with the

precinct committeemen

movement, is all that is necessary to begin this process. By doing so, a shift of major and immediate proportions is possible.

Getting to the root of the problem

Nothing has worked

Danger lurks

Things are bad

Underlying Symptoms

The Appearance Of Divisions Social/Political Dysfunction

More Concealed

Gross Imbalances Of Power

Key Enabler

The Separation Of Immediate And Powerful Civic Action From Our Media And Learning Systems.

To a genuine Solution

Getting Focused

Requires Identifying What Is Essential

To A Genuine Solution

It will enable a powerful yet easy organizing of the participating public.
It will have immediate and unquestionable impact; it has to work fast.
Therefore, it cannot depend on any amendments to the Constitution or other laws and reforms.
It will immediately give the people clear direct grant or deny power over all elected officials.
It will get immediate and unquestionable results with very small numbers of people; 1 to 2% or less.
It will work at all levels of government, in all geographies; equally well and fast.
It will fuse immediate and powerful civic action to our media and learning systems.
In civic and electoral affairs, it will sideline our crazed media feeder system and create a powerful,
deliberative place of qualititave citizenship and engagement.
It will instill confidence and create safety for all participants.

It Will miss!

Why is it essential that each and every element here be present in any proposal that purports to offer a solution?

Because if anything is missing;

it will miss!

Establishing criteria allows us to quickly apply what we already have learned and know so we can:

Carefully define
Reject what will fail
Identify what can work

Come have a look

Prefer a book ?

The "system" is broken, voting doesn’t matter, and the elites,

money, and parties rule; we know!

But, is that all there is to it?

It's a reality and you either have some or you don't
Which do you prefer? View this brief playlist

INTRODUCTION

the greatest?

America; the greatest country- in the history of the world?

That politicians – American or any other - would flatter their citizens with such rhetoric should be no surprise; old trick. Flattery is disarming and an effective tool of communications; perhaps even...

Well, no.

In fact this pervasive conventional wisdom is a major problem because it only considers the bad outcomes; and then pronounces everything hopeless. That is bias-confirming non-analysis and must be rejected! Because it makes no effort to understand what gives these tactics power, why they are successful, and what could be done about it; we never identify what we can do about it. A system is a system because it will produce results that can be known and relied upon. The question: Through a very different approach and understanding, to and of this very system, can We create very different outcomes; with certainty?

Proceed To The Homepage